Core architecture matters as does the rest of the product or system in question. What does all this mean for gamers? The key takeaway is not to focus too much on what product is using what process node. Ok, it takes a lot of power to get there but still, 5.5 GHz!
Intel calls its 10nm node 'Intel 7'-which is obviously a marketing tactic-though its transistor density is reportedly as good as that of competing smaller 7nm nodes.īut that aside, look at what Intel is able to achieve despite its apparent process disadvantage: Its Core i9 12900KS can reach 5.5 GHz out of the box. The same can be said of Intel and its 12th Gen CPUs. Intel’s long gestating 10nm process is a good example of one that struggled to make a space for itself.īest CPU for gaming: the top chips from Intel and AMDīest graphics card: your perfect pixel-pusher awaitsīest SSD for gaming: get into the game ahead of the rest Sometimes, a bleeding edge node simply can’t compete with a mature one. Also, one company’s node is not always directly comparable to another’s. Power efficiency gains are often used up in the quest for higher performance and sometimes this means a chip on a smaller node can end up requiring more power and running hotter than its predecessor.
More dies per wafer means more final product to sell, and ever higher profits. The other key reason is that smaller transistors and smaller dies mean that more chips can be squeezed out of a traditional 300mm wafer. An otherwise like-for-like chip on a smaller node will typically deliver better power efficiency, and therefore output less heat.
Companies have a never-ending desire to move to ever smaller nodes. When we review a new CPU or GPU generation, we always talk a little about process technology.
0 kommentar(er)
